![]() ![]() The slave draws a line that should not be crossed further not only by his master but by any master against his slaves. When the slave rebels against the master, the slave, in a sense, rebels in the name of all slaves. (Compare: "None of us is free, if even one is chained").Ĭamus sees in the act of rebellion a way that values can originate in an absurd world. Leaving aside for a moment socio-historical reasons that might make such an act even mandatory, it is however an assertion that makes the whole community conscious of it, even if only one person does it. Rebellion is an act of freedom par excellence. ![]() The person can only act, and can act freely in that. I would like to add, that according to existentialism (eg Sartre), the person is confronted with her freedom. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |